Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2023cv20495
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Bat Conservation International, Miami Blue Chapter of the North American Butterfly Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior and National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 ESA - Endangered Species Act
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. National Park Service et al
as 2:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council , Center for Biological Diversity , National Parks Conservation Association and others
Defendant:
National Park Service , Sally Jewell , Jonathan B. Jarvis and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Burnett Oil Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Mulby v. National Park Service
as 3:2014cv01473
Plaintiff:
Darlene Mulby
Defendant:
National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Parks Conservation Association et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
National Parks Conservation Association and John Adornato, III
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior , National Park Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv23523
Plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and others
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 2:2008cv00237
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife , Sierra Club , The Humane Society of The United States and others
Defendant:
Ken Salazar , Jonathan Jarvis , Sam Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
