Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Rameses Lomingkit, et al v. Apollo Education Group, Inc., et al
as 17-16634
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAMESES TE LOMINGKIT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND and GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND
Defendant - Appellee: APOLLO EDUCATION GROUP, INC., PETER V. SPERLING, GREGORY W. CAPPELLI and others
City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System v. Prudential Financial, Inc.
as 2:2015mc00295
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System, Heavy & General Laborers' Locals 473 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds, National Shopmen Pension Fund and others
Movant: John Chiang
Defendant: Prudential Financial, Inc.
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015mc00146
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System , National Shopmen Pension Fund , Heavy & General Laborers Locals 472 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds and others
Defendant: Prudential Financial Inc., Strangfeld R. John and Mark B. Grier
Movant: California Department of Insurance and David E. Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System v. Prudential Financial Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014mc80161
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System
Defendant: Prudential Financial Inc., National Shopmen Pension Fund , Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension & Annuity Funds and others
Movant: California Department of Insurance
National Shopmen Pension Fund v. Twin Erectors & Steel Fabricators Inc
as 2:2011mc00143
Plaintiff: National Shopmen Pension Fund
Defendant: Twin Erectors & Steel Fabricators Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?