Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-3292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ASST. SECRETARY JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Oak Ridge Envlt Peace Alliance, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 19-6391
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and LISA E. GORDON-HAGERTY, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE, ED SULLIVAN, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and others
Oak Ridge Envtl Peace Alliance, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 19-6332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH HUTCHISON, OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE, ED SULLIVAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and LISA E. GORDON-HAGERTY, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-3500
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator, U.S. E.P.A., UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance et al v. Perry et al (PLR2)
as 3:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance , Nuclear Watch of New Mexico , Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Defendant:
James Richard Perry and Frank G. Klotz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Concerned Pastors, et al v. Nick Khouri, et al
as 16-2628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, MELISSA MAYS, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NICK KHOURI, in his official capacity as Secretary of Treasury of the State of Michigan, FREDERICK HEADEN, in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Flint Receivership Advisory Board, MICHAEL A. TOWNSEND, in his official capacity as Member of the Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Defendant:
NATASHA HENDERSON, in her official capacity as City Administrator and FLINT, CITY OF
Concerned Pastors for Social Action et al v. Khouri et al
as 2:2016cv10277
Plaintiff:
Concerned Pastors for Social Action , Melissa Mays , American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan and others
Defendant:
Nick A. Khouri , Frederick Headen , Michael A. Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-3885
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC., GEORGIA AGRIBUSINESS COUNCIL, INC. and GREATER ATLANTA HOMEBUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and others
Natural Resources Defense Cnsl v. EPA, et al
as 15-3820
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
USA v. DTE Energy, et al
as 11-2328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant - Appellee:
DTE ENERGY and DETROIT EDISON CO.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
