Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Young v. Cabrera
as 23-316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Cabrera, Shawn Johnston, Keith Di Presso and others
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, K. COLT, JAMES P. CALIGURE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL ADEYEMI OMOTOSHO, MICHAEL T. CHOCK, JULIO RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03028
Defendant:
Eric Cabrera, Neil Casey, Keith Di Presso and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURG v. JUDGE MAGISTRATE KEVIN MORSE et al
as 2:2016cv00810
Plaintiff:
JAYSON HARLEY BURG
Defendant:
JUDGE MAGISTRATE KEVIN MORSE, JUDGE MAGISTRATE EMERY TOTH and JUDGE MAGISTRATE NEIL CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01786
Plaintiff:
June Campbell, Cherell Tillman and Dawn Tillman
Defendant:
SGT. Neil Casey, DET. Anthony Desposito, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delgado et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00467
Defendant:
Neil Casey, City of New York and John Does 1-4
Plaintiff:
Seldon Delgado and Ovell Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Eaton v. Thomas Tosti, et al
as 10-2814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES P. EATON, INDIVIDUALLY, DBA Eatons Estate Service
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS TOSTI, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL CAPACITY, NEIL CASEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL CAPACITY, TOWN OF NEWTON, NEW JERSEY and others
EATON v. TOSTI et al
as 2:2009cv05248
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. EATON
Defendant:
THOMAS TOSTI, NEIL CASEY, THE TOWN OF NEWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. GALINSKI et al
as 2:2009cv02694
Plaintiff:
RANDY SCOTT
Defendant:
EDMUND GALINSKI, JOHN PASSASELLA, ELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
