Cases 1 - 10 of 755
McKinnon et al v. Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Stuart McKinnon and Michael Cox
Defendant:
Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners, Kalkaska Memorial Health Center, kalkaska County Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nichols #734845 v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols #734845
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Balldini and Unknown Neeble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward, III v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
James V. Ward, III
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Joseph Traverso, Damon Pulver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Perkins v. Westsall
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Nichole Westsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicholls et al v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Karyn Nicholls, Soumendu Das, Rose Harris and others
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., Optum Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Nichols v. State of
as 2:2024cv10543
Petitioner:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Nichols v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv10542
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Perry, Balldini and Neeble
Neal v. Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree et al.
as 5:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Marc Neal
Defendant:
Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Summit Psychological Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pike v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Nichole Pike
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2024cv10345
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Nichols
Defendant:
Anne Marie McCarthy, Kim L. Worthy, David M. Parrott and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
