Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2020cv03827
Plaintiff:
NOAH SHACHTMAN, THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT and JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Defendant:
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
as 1:2020cv03487
Plaintiff:
NOAH SHACHTMAN, THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT and JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2018cv01513
Plaintiff:
NOAH SHACHTMAN, SAM STEIN, THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2018cv00781
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT , NOAH SHACHTMAN and BETSY WOODRUFF
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2017cv01281
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT , NOAH SHACHTMAN and BETSY WOODRUFF
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT , NOAH SHACHTMAN and SPENCER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT and NOAH SHACHTMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT and NOAH SHACHTMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
