Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alton & Southern Railway Company, et al v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Divisi
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alton & Southern Railway Company, Belt Railway Company of Chicago, Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
ALTON & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al v. BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
as 1:2019cv03586
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., BELT RAILWAY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. and others
Defendant:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company v. South Norfolk Jordan Bridge, LLC
as 2:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
South Norfolk Jordan Bridge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
City of Chesapeake v. Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
City of Chesapeake and City of Chesapeake
Defendant:
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company, Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company and Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
City of Chesapeake v. Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
as 3:2009cv00519
Plaintiff:
City of Chesapeake
Defendant:
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company, Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company and Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company v. M/V MARLIN et al
as 2:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company and Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
M/V MARLIN, Marlin Shipping Limited and SMT Shipmanagement & Transport LTD.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
