Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Manion v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
as 5:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kernan Manion
Defendant:
North Carolina Medical Board , North Carolina Physicians Health Program, Inc. , North Carolina Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne , Robert Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
as 4:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
North Carolina Medical Board, Janelle R Rhyne, Robert Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Joseph Jemsek v. State of North Carolina
as 15-1420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JEMSEK, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD, JANELLE R. RHYNE, M.D. and others
Jemsek v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
State of North Carolina , North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission
as 5:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
Amicu:
North Carolina Medical Board , North Carolina Board of Nursing , North Carolina Board of Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
