Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MCCUNE v. BELL et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. MCCUNE, JR.
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BELL, C.O. JOHN DOE, DEPT. OF CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, Superintendent R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Noel v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tiron Daniel Noel
Defendant:
Brad Shoemaker, Ryan Barnes, Dr. McGlanudlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
David Murphy, Benjamin Mathis and Ashley Capiga
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, C.O. Donnaly, C.O. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDFERN v. WARREN et al
as 2:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
JAYSEN M. REDFERN
Defendant:
WARDEN WARREN and NURSE KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORLEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
DEMITRUS CORLEY
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, III and NURSE KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TODD v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv02769
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE TODD
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, III and NURSE KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
JERMINA LEWIS
Defendant:
EUGENE J. CALDWELL, II and NURSE KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BUTLER
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, III and NURSE KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
