Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Christina Apostoli and Kelly Lafave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Chai Mai Roon, et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, Chan Mai Roon, Htaw Rot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan (PS) v. Latore, et al
as 1:2023cv02894
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent, Kelly Latore, Kaire Colwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chan (PS) v. Roon
as 1:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Attorney General State of Colorado, Chan Moi Roon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. Fischer et al
as 1:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
Fischer, Hackler and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv00877
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
