Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Poku v. Garland
as 21-6318
Petitioner:
NANA OWUSU POKU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
United States of America v. Olivo (Edwin Romero)
as 19-4053
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Anibal Gonzalez)
as 19-3684
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anibal Gonzalez
United States of America v. Olivo (Romero)
as 18-2026
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Rafael Romero, Francis Paluzzi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Scott)
as 18-1817
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Edwin Romero, Rafael Romero and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wayne Scott
Chance v. Owusu et al
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
James Henry Chance
Defendant:
Christina Nana Owusu, Kofi Owusu-Sotia, metLife Auto and Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nana Owusu v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-2302
Petitioner:
NANA OWUSU, a/k/a Nana Kwaku Owusu, a/k/a Nana Kweku Owusu
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Suffolk Center Receiver, LLC v. Owusu
as 2:2011cv05184
Defendant:
Nana Owusu
Plaintiff:
Suffolk Center Receiver, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Poku v. Holder
as 10-3428
Petitioner:
Nana Owusu Poku
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Janet Napolitano, United States Secretary of Homeland Security and Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, United States Immigration and Citizenship Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
