Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Boyd v. Reyes et al
as 2:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, Warren Roberts, Charles Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Adaja Madison and Estate of Jermelle Madison
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Naphcare Inc., Angela Brandenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crapser et al v. NaphCare, Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Crapser and Rhonda Burke
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc, Clackamas County, Jill Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keanaaina v. Garrett et al
as 3:2021cv00741
Defendant:
Trinity Service Group, Inc, Sheriff Pat Garrett, NaphCare, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Keanaaina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacholl v. Clackamas County et al
as 2:2021cv00538
Defendant:
SHERIE CHANEY, CRYSTAL BOYER, CARRIE RALL and others
Plaintiff:
FRED R PACHOLL, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pacholl v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Defendant:
Sherie Chaney, Crystal Boyer, Carrie Rall and others
Plaintiff:
Fred R. Pacholl, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Martha Rojo, Julie Radostitz and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Rigoberto Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misuraca v. Washington County Detention Center/Jail et al
as 3:2020cv01597
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Washington County Detention Center/Jail, Telemate and others
Plaintiff:
Airian Jovan Misuraca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms-Belaire v. Washington County et al
as 3:2020cv00338
Defendant:
Washington County and NaphCare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Simms-Belaire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
