Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jessie Lozano v. Sheriff, Charlotte County, et al
as 22-13561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE LOZANO
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, CHARLOTTE COUNTY, NATHAN EDWARDS, CCSO Jail Detective, COCHRAN, Internal Affairs Sergeant and others
Lozano v. Prummell, Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lozano
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Jr., Nathan Edwards, Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37969
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08970
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74504
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWARD MELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88018
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWARD AARSETH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71919
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLAIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HAGER, JOSHUA WIKHOLM, DANNY BRADEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prim v. USA
as 1:2016cv00233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathan Edward Prim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fussell v. City of Port St. Lucie et al
as 2:2015cv14311
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edward Fussell
Defendant:
City of Port St. Lucie and Edward Glaser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
