Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Martinez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01389
Petitioner:
Michael Nathan Martinez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Gilbert, Town of et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Janissa Mendoza
Defendant:
Gilbert, Town of and Nathan Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Martinez
as 21-20414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathan Martinez, Fugitive
Federal Trade Commission v. Tarr Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02024
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Tarr Inc., Ad Kings LLC, Apex Advertising LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
McClure v. Farr et al
as 5:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
Edward Farr, Michael Miller, Cody Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cree, Inc. v. Tarr Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Cree, Inc.
Defendant:
Tarr Inc., Iron Ads, LLC, Nathan Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Martinez, et al v. Valdez, et al
as 15-1364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL MARTINEZ, JR., NATHAN MARTINEZ, DANIEL MARTINEZ, III and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON VALDEZ, ROBERT MARTINEZ, ROBERT MOTYKA and others
Martinez, et al v. Valdez, et al
as 15-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MARTINEZ, JR., NATHAN MARTINEZ, DANIEL MARTINEZ, III and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON VALDEZ, ROBERT MARTINEZ, ROBERT MOTYKA and others
Gonzalo Aguilar, et. al. v. KLX Energy Services, LLC., et. al.
as 5:2015cv00781
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Aguilar, Martin Contreras, Christopher Fierro and others
Defendant:
Cornell Wireline Services, LLC and KLX Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shahid Rana, et al v. Mary Schneider, et al
as 14-15640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHID RANA and SABINA RANA, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY CATHERINE SCHNEIDER, JORGE FRANK, ADELA VALDEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
