Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BROOKS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv03922
Petitioner: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROOKS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03795
Petitioner: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROOKS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2015cv02560
Petitioner: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Respondent: ED MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WEST CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKS v. WALKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv07383
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Defendant: LAURA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. ZANIC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv07111
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Defendant: GEORGE ZANIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. KANE et al
as 2:2013cv01266
Petitioner: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR
Respondent: HAROLD H. KANE, THOMAS E. GEHRET, CHERYL KREISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klinefelter et al v. City of Clearwater We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv01394
Plaintiff: John Klinefelter , Michael Aleksa , Sergo Alexandre and others
Defendant: City of Clearwater
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROOKS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2010cv03366
Petitioner: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Nathaniel Brooks, Jr.
as 10-2455
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Defendant - Respondent: SALLEY WATKINS
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: THOMAS N O'NEILL, JR.
Nathaniel Brooks, Jr. v. Salley Watkin
as 09-4200
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: SALLEY WATKINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?