Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Albro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01769
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thomas Albro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Short et al
as 1:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant:
Sgt. Short, Sgt. Brown, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HERRING v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERRING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER CHARLIE WARD, WARDEN BERRY, WARDEN PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41915
Plaintiff:
TYCSON NATHANIEL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26372
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05744
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2020cv00076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87005
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL THOMAS BOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Terrence Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
