Cases 41 - 50 of 55
SIMMERS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. SIMMERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 2
STEELE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
HEATHER STEELE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KENNY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
JOHN KENNY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GULLIVER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2016cv02219
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GULLIVER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 23
ELDEB v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2016cv02189
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELDEB
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WYDLER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01897
Plaintiff:
HANS WYDLER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SMITH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01070
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
VASS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE VASS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RABER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv02166
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE RABER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEVINE et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
AARON LEVINE and BARBARA LEVINE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
