Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gurrola v. Apple Inc et al
as 4:2019cv02389
Defendant:
ESRI Corporation, Google Inc., Isabel Dias and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Gurrola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv00734
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elton Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2016cv02775
Plaintiff:
Paul Louis Blank
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellington Jordan v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02765
Defendant:
Does, Sylvia Lopez, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ellington Jordan
Wooten v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2013cv08261
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wooten
Defendant:
Flagstaff, City of, Robert Bruce Wallace, Grant P Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
Faith Lewis
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simone Hill v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00134
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Simon Hill
Sabetta et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00554
Plaintiff:
Anne Sabetta and Karl Wichelman
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, City of Marysville, County of Yuba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Martinez v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 10-55215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a government-owned corporation doing business as Amtrak
Dannette Gonzalez v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 09-35422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNETTE GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
