Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Trump, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3034
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-3030
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Office of Management and Budget and others
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2025cv03698
Plaintiff:
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, American Federation Of State County And Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump, United States Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
H.R. Ewell, Inc., et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 25-1475
Petitioner:
H.R. EWELL, INC., WESTERN STATES TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA FUELS & CONVENIENCE ALLIANCE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
American Petroleum Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 25-1478
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 25-1480
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS and ENERGY MARKETERS OF AMERICA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LEE ZELDIN, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 25-1493
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, ENERGY MARKETERS OF AMERICA and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al v. EPA, et al
as 25-1083
Petitioner:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and Energy Marketers of America
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC, et al v. EPA
as 25-1078
Petitioner:
Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC and Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Northern Alaska Environmental Center, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 3:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Wilderness League, Oceana, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Doug Burgum and Howard W. Lutnick
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
