Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 839
Garfield County, Utah, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4106
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner: GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant: U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Debra Haaland, Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc. et al v. United States Department of the Navy
as 8:2023cv01650
Plaintiff: Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc. and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Clean Water Act - Citizen Suits re Environmental Matters
Advanced Energy United, et al v. FERC
as 23-1123
Petitioner: Advanced Energy United, Clean Energy Buyers Association, Energy Alabama and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 23-1117
Petitioner: Appalachian Voices, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2023cv00982
Plaintiff: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant: JANET COIT, GINA M. RAIMONDO, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae: LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. FERC
as 23-1071
Petitioner: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner: ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant: North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae: Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
HEALTHY GULF et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2023cv00604
Plaintiff: HEALTHY GULF, BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant: DEBRA A. HAALAND, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Petitioner: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. and AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?