Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Nave v. Pugh et al
as 1:2022cv03991
Plaintiff: Kenneth Sesley Nave
Defendant: Lamont Pugh, Christy Wells, Peter Theiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nave v. Wells et al
as 1:2022cv03566
Plaintiff: Dr. Ken S. Nave
Defendant: Christy Wells, Peter Theiler, Cathy Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00224
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
National Telecommunication Distributors, Inc. v. Yousaf et al
as 1:2016cv11752
Plaintiff: National Telecommunication Distributors Inc
Defendant: Muhammad Yousaf, Ahsan Butt, Qadeer Ahsan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Oakley, Inc. v. Yiyi, et al
as 1:2015cv05963
Defendant: Tehmina, Davis, Tentxung Youxian Gongsi and others
Plaintiff: Chhavi, Patel, Mary and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Class v. Nave We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03089
Plaintiff: Cristhian M Class
Defendant: Lt. Nave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naves et al v. Pristine Legal Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv09276
Plaintiff: Pedro Naves and Angelica Naves
Defendant: Pristine Legal Solutions and Vatreni, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Gasko et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03087
Petitioner: Donnel Wright
Respondent: David M Gasko, Lamaster and Lt. Nave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Gasko et al
as 1:2013cv00645
Plaintiff: Donnel Wright
Defendant: David M Gasko, Lamaster and Lt. Nave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Nave
as 1:2013cv00512
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank N.A.
Defendant: Rose Nave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?