Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright
as 19-6780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DMITRY PRONIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEAL URCH, L. BLACKWELL and CHARLES WRIGHT, "Chuck"
Defendant:
ASHLEY MCCANN
Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright
as 17-6613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DMITRY PRONIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WRIGHT, "Chuck", NEAL URCH, ASHLEY MCCANN and others
Pronin v. Wright et al
as 5:2016cv03635
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
Charles Wright, Neal Urch, Ashley McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough et al v. Wright et al
as 5:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Phillip Yarbrough and Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
Charles Wright, ., Neal Urch, Ashley McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. McDonald et al
as 9:2016cv00861
Plaintiff:
Robert Russell Thompson
Defendant:
Dr McDonald, Nurse White, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Spartanburg County Detention Center and/or Medical et al
as 0:2015cv04979
Plaintiff:
Michael Hubbard
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center and/or Medical, Nurse White, Dr McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond v. Spartanburg County Jail et al
as 5:2015cv04713
Plaintiff:
Edward Drummond
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Jail, Sargent Blackwell, Neal Urch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond v. Spartanburg County et al
as 5:2015cv04285
Plaintiff:
Edward Drummond
Defendant:
Spartanburg County, Neal Urch, Virginia DuPont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pauling v. Wright et al
as 9:2014cv04501
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lamont Pauling
Defendant:
Chuck Wright, Neal Urch, William J Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
