Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Ned Nakles
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
NED NAKLES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
