Cases 41 - 50 of 352
Harry Powell v. Nedra Chandler
as 14-2766
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY POWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden
Galaviz-Galaviz v. Chandler et al
as 3:2014cv50170
Petitioner:
Leonel Galaviz-Galaviz
Respondent:
Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Chandler et al
as 3:2014cv50171
Plaintiff:
Peter A Lewis
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Joannam Kemmeren, R. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Chandler et al
as 1:2014cv05431
Plaintiff:
Andra Sampson
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Becky Williams, Samantha Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Brown v. Michael Randle, et al
as 14-2480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity only, and not in his official capacity, NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden, Warden of Dixon Correctional Center, in her individual capacity only, not in her official capacity and KATHY CHAVERA, former field services representative at Dixon Correctional Center, in her individual capacity only, and not in her official capacity
Roberson v. Chandler et al
as 1:2014cv05029
Plaintiff:
Willie Roberson
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Chandler et al
as 1:2014cv04815
Petitioner:
Marcellus Thomas
Respondent:
Nedra Chandler and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Chandler et al
as 1:2014cv02668
Plaintiff:
Deion L. Turner
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, William G. Lawcc, II, Becky Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edens v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2014cv50056
Plaintiff:
James R. Edens
Defendant:
John O'Brien, Louis Shicker, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Chandler et al
as 3:2014cv50047
Plaintiff:
Victor Diaz
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, John O'Brien , John Crisham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
