Cases 1 - 10 of 339
Van Druten v. McDowell
as 24-1800
Petitioner:
JOHN JAMES VAN DRUTEN
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel Ortega et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas, Manuel Ortega, Ricardo Rosas and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allison, Warden Neil McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. McDowell
as 23-3992
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBERTO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL
Marcus Aubry v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv02400
Petitioner:
Marcus Aubry
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. McDowell
as 4:2023cv04405
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
