Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc v. Burlington Stores, Inc., et al
as 17-56239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEMAN BROTHERS AND ASSOC., INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
BURLINGTON STORES, INC., a New Jersey corporation, ONE STEP UP, LTD., a New York corporation and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. Zulily LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02648
Defendant:
121 BLVD, DOES, Imerc, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc et al v. Cann Studio Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00362
Defendant:
Cann Studio Inc, Cornerstone Apparel, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. La Main Connection Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00348
Defendant:
Does, La Main Connection Inc and Ross Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. True Destiny, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09224
Defendant:
Does, Ross Stores, Inc. and True Destiny, LLC
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08319
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc. Inc
Neman Brothers & Assoc., Inc. v. Ross Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08321
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive and Ross Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. Touch Me Fashion, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06235
Defendant:
Does, Ross Stores Inc. and Touch Me Fashion, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. Ross Stores Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06243
Defendant:
Does and Ross Stores Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc. v. Burlington Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05824
Defendant:
Burlington Stores, Inc., Does and One Step Up LTD
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers and Assoc., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.