Cases 1 - 10 of 489
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4016
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
VideoLabs, Inc. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. et al
as 5:2025mc80031
Plaintiff:
VideoLabs, Inc.
Defendant:
Asustek Computer, Inc. and HP Inc.
Petitioner:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Baker v. Hannah-Jones
as 25-300
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. BAKER, JR.
Defendant:
NIKOLE HANNAH-JONES, IBRAM X. KENDI, KEISHA BLAIN and others
Eric Hunt v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00593
Plaintiff:
Eric Hunt
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Steven Allan Spielberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collier v. Netflix, Inc., et al.
as 25-210
Defendant:
HYPEROBJECT INDUSTRIES, a Delaware limited liability company, DOES, 1-50 inclusive, BLUEGRASS FILMS, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. COLLIER
Pirani, et al. v. Netflix, Inc., et al.
as 25-54
Defendant:
REED HASTINGS, SPENCER NEUMANN, TED SARANDOS and others
Petitioner:
TY CORREY
Plaintiff:
FIYYAZ PIRANI, as Trustee of Imperium Irrevocable Trust and CLEVELAND BAKERS AND TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND
Whyte Monkee Productions, LLC, et al. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 24-7872
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC.
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SEPI and WHYTE MONKEE PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Netflix, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv09324
Defendant:
VMware LLC and Broadcom Inc.
Plaintiff:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Augustus Gaines v. T-Mobile, et al
as 24-3306
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., T-MOBILE USA, INC., AT&T, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS B. GAINES, JR.
In re: Caleb McGillvary
as 24-3327
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
NICHOLAS P. SCUTARI, NETFLIX INC, THEODORE J. ROMANKOW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
