Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thigpen v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04140
Defendant:
New York City Department Corrections, Captain Remy and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Samuel Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams-Flores et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv12150
Plaintiff:
Nichole Adams-Flores
Defendant:
Cynthia Brann, New York City Department Corrections, Dr. Ross MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06149
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City of Correction Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Muhammad v. Cohen
as 13-1788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre D. Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Cohen, Michale Latunji, J. Tan and others
Muhammad v. Cohen et al
as 1:2013cv01422
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Muhammad
Defendant:
Robert Cohen, Michale Latunji, J. Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollis v. New York City of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Robert Hollis
Defendant:
New York City of Corrections, Dora B. Schriro, Robert N. Cripps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollis v. New York City of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00749
Plaintiff:
Robert Hollis
Defendant:
New York City of Corrections, Dora B. Schrir, Robert Cripps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. New York City of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv09637
Plaintiff:
Alex Perez
Defendant:
New York City of Corrections, Dora B. Schiro, Robert N. Cripps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
