Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Yiries Joseph Aseph Saad Maura et al v Scotiabank Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Yiries Joseph Asef Saad Maura , William Lopez-Colon , Nancy Colon-Berrios and others
Defendant:
Scotiabank Puerto Rico, Inc., MidFirst Bank, PR Asset Porfolio 2013-1 International LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
Lilliam Gonzalez-Camacho , Javier Carmona , Dolores S. Garcia and others
Defendant:
Banco Popular Puerto Rico, Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Rodriguez-Nichols
as 3:2015cv02713
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Haydee Rodriguez-Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz-Marrero et al v. Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Ortiz-Marrero , Nestor R Rodriguez-Aponte , Margie Rola-Zabala and others
Defendant:
Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico , Popular Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC v. Estate of Marvin Javier Colon-Alicea et al
as 3:2015cv02233
Plaintiff:
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Estate of Marvin Javier Colon-Alicea, Sonia Minerva Colon-Romero, Karla Cristina Colon-Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez-Nichols v. USA
as 3:2013cv01134
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eddie S. Rodriguez-Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tromble et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01162
Plaintiff:
Howard Tromble, John Prichard, Ernest Randolph and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
