Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Online Merchants Guild v. Nicolas Maduros
as 21-16911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ONLINE MERCHANTS GUILD
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLAS MADUROS, Director, California Dept. of Tax & Fee Administration
Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros
as 2:2020at00954
Plaintiff:
Online Merchants Guild
Defendant:
Nicolas Maduros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros
as 2:2020cv01952
Plaintiff:
Online Merchants Guild
Defendant:
Nicolas Maduros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Byron, III v. CDTFA, et al
as 20-55125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH J. BYRON III
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLAS MADUROS, Director of the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration and DOES, 1-50
Big Sandy Rancheria Enterprise v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 19-16777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BIG SANDY RANCHERIA ENTERPRISES, a federally-chartered corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLAS MADUROS, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Joseph J. Byron III v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration
as 2:2019cv06742
Defendant:
California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, DOES 1-50 and Nicolas Maduros
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Byron and Joseph J. Byron III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BIG SANDY RANCHERIA ENTERPRISES, a federally-chartered corporation v. Becerra et al
as 2:2018at01188
Plaintiff:
BIG SANDY RANCHERIA ENTERPRISES, a federally-chartered corporation
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Nicolas Maduros
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Big Sandy Rancheria Enterprises v. Becerra et al
as 1:2018cv00958
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Nicolas Maduros
Plaintiff:
Big Sandy Rancheria Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
