Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ESTATE OF ADAN YOMER ROLDAN LLANOS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03989
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ADAN YOMER ROLDAN LLANOS and Nicole Diaz
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DIAZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11510
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DIAZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIAZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17450
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DIAZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz et al v. Darling Ingredients Inc.
as 1:2020cv01259
Plaintiff:
Nicole Diaz, Albert Maldonado, Robert Diaz and others
Defendant:
Darling Ingredients Inc. d/b/a DarPro and Pepcol Manufacturing, Darling Ingredients Inc. and Darling Ingredients Inc. doing business as DarPro and Pepcol Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Diaz v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv04345
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Estrella Jail and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Plaintiff:
Lydia Nicole Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-13958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
