Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,362
Henry (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00404
Plaintiff: Jeremy Michael Henry
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCann (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00382
Petitioner: Michael McCann
Respondent: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillotson (PS) v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2025cv00343
Plaintiff: Chris Tillotson
Defendant: No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00335
Plaintiff: Ray Jones
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00287
Plaintiff: William Brian Cook
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00293
Plaintiff: John Edward Thomas
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2025cv00032
Plaintiff: Scott W Humphreys
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaye v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
as 25-150
Plaintiff: MELISSA KAYE
Defendant: NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, PATRICIA YANG, said names being fictitious, the persons intended being those who aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of the named Defendants, ELIZABETH FORD, said names being fictitious, the persons intended being those who aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of the named Defendants and others
Ford (PS) v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2025cv00155
Plaintiff: Frank Ford
Defendant: No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galindo (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00121
Plaintiff: Troy L. Galindo
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?