Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-769
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RACHEL MITCHELL, Maricopa County Attorney, AUBREY ACKERMAN, Deputy County Attorney, JASON TYLER GRONSKI, Public Defender and others
Gregory v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-1855
Not Yet Classified:
AZ EYMAN LIBRARIAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DARNELL GREGORY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CHARLES L RYAN, Director of ADOC, Unknown THOMPSON, named as Mr. Thompson, Complex Warden at Eyman Complex and others
Wimmer v. No Defendant Named
as 21-1413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER DARREN WIMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
NO DEFENDANT NAMED
In Re: Ex Parte Application of HMM CO. LTD For Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 To Obtain Discovery For Use In Foreign Proceedings
as 3:2021mc80113
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Plaintiff:
HMM Co. Ltd
Davis v. All Defendants Named in 4:13-CV-7-RBS et al
as 5:2016mc00053
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
All Defendants Named in 4:13-CV-7-RBS, All Defendants Named in 4:13-CV-53-RBS, All Defendants Named in 5:16-CT-3211-OC and others
Ted Marcum v. Richard Jones, et al
as 16-3389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED MARCUM
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD K. JONES, All defendants named herein are sued in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT BROWN, All defendants named herein are sued in their individual and official capacities and DENNIS ADAMS, All defendants named herein are sued in their individual and official capacities
Robinson v. Gregoire et al
as 1:2015cv08631
Plaintiff:
No Party Named
Defendant:
No Defendant Named
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Pinson, et al
as 13-1196
Petitioner:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON and CHARLES HIPPS
Respondent:
NO DEFENDANTS NAMED
Merrill v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
David Merrill
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Assistance to foreign & international tribunals & litigants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
