Cases 31 - 40 of 410
Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd. v. The NOCO Company, Inc.
as 22-1741
Appellant:
SHENZHEN CARKU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Appellee:
THE NOCO COMPANY, INC.
The NOCO Company, Inc. v. Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd.
as 22-1646
Appellant:
THE NOCO COMPANY, INC.
Appellee:
SHENZHEN CARKU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated
as 2:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Pilot Incorporated
Defendant:
NOCO Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Noco Company v. Zhejiang Leiya Electronics Co., Ltd
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Zhejiang Leiya Electronics Co., Ltd doing business as Erayak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Noco Company v. Yaber Technologies Co., Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Yaber Technologies Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Vigor Power Battery Co. Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Vigor Power Battery Co. Ltd. doing business as FCONEGY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Noco Company v. Liandongweiye Keji Co. Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Liandongweiye Keji Co. Ltd. doing business as Flylinktech
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
The NOCO Company, Inc. v. Shenzhen Carku Technology Co. Ltd.
as 1:2021cv02319
Plaintiff:
The NOCO Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Carku Technology Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noco Company v. Mac Calabur Investments, LLC
as 1:2021cv02173
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Mac Calabur Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Jacobs
as 1:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Yaakov Jacobs doing business as Jay's Buy Box
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
