Cases 1 - 10 of 218
BEBOUT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 3:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BEBOUT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
WILSON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
MARK WILSON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
DIGALBDO v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2024cv05600
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIGALBDO
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Carlton Bates Company et al
as 2:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Defendant:
Carlton Bates Company and WESCO Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Roberts v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 4:2024cv01264
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kulakowski v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 4:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Dominick Kulakowski
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
