Cases 1 - 10 of 10
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
James et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2022cv01519
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and others
Plaintiff:
John A. James, Aaron Tiffany and Christopher Kopf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
Jeff Franke, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-3848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFF FRANKE, STEVEN FRYE and GREG FISH
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
Franke et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv02152
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Franke, Steven Frye and Greg Fish
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Comp, et al
as 20-3281
Defendant / Appellee:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, DAVID N. RAY, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, CHRISTOPHER KOPF and AARON TIFFANY
Franke v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv00478
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff E. Franke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frye v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fish v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv00476
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2019cv01498
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David N Ray, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tiffany, Christopher Kopf, John A James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
