Cases 61 - 68 of 68
LOVELESS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv63803
Plaintiff:
KIT H. LOVELESS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv63799
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN E. MILLER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROADHURST v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv63802
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. BROADHURST, SR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EVANS et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62869
Plaintiff:
DREW EVANS and SHIRLEY EVANS
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, A & I COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOGGS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62868
Plaintiff:
HAROLD RAY BOGGS and CONNIE BOGGS
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, A & I COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DORSEY et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62870
Plaintiff:
ALFRED P. DORSEY and ROSE DORSEY
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, A & I COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHARP et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62871
Plaintiff:
HUBERT C. SHARP and JO ANN SHARP
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, A & I COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EDGE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv61447
Plaintiff:
JACKSON E. EDGE and JACKSON E. EDGE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SOUTHERN RAILWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
