Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2020cv00343
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Kyle F Williams
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BRUCE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00040
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF LOUISVILLE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr CHRISTOPHER L BRUCE and CHRISTOPHER L. BRUCE
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kelley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2020cv03016
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Paul F Kelley
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CAUFIELD v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. CAUFIELD
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TRUPPO v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2019cv01953
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TRUPPO
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Whitworth v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Lori C Whitworth
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Thomas v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Douglas L Thomas
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rouch v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2018cv01025
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, AVI Food Systems, Inc., Professional Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rouch
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dravet v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company et al
as 2:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
Michael Dravet
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jackson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Brian Jackson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
