Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Rose v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2008cv02277
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rose, III
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Qualls v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Qualls, Jeffrey Qualls and Jeffrey Qualls
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lipp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Lipp
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilliland v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gilliland
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aurand v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dennis Aurand
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVAULT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. DEVAULT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becraft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eric D Becraft and Eric D Becraft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
KOPP v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. KOPP
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wilson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2007cv00528
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson, Darnell Wilson and Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
