Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Dipert v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dean Dipert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Mediator:
John W Whiteleather, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. CSX Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Osborne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Ball and Angela Ball
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Professional Transportation Inc, Maureen Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Craft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Evelyn G Craft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
John R Clark and John R Clark
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gove v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Vernon Gove, Vernon Gove and Vernon Gove
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fey v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Terry M Fey
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Qualls v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Qualls, Jeffrey Qualls and Jeffrey Qualls
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lipp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Lipp
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilliland v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gilliland
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
