Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Gilliland v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gilliland
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aurand v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dennis Aurand
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVAULT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. DEVAULT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becraft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eric D Becraft and Eric D Becraft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
KOPP v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. KOPP
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wilson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2007cv00528
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson, Darnell Wilson and Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gonzales et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Linda Gonzales and Esteban Gonzales
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
STOKES v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STOKES
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
DAVISON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00494
Plaintiff:
RICK E. DAVISON and RICK E. DAVISON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
