Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Eubanks v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Elaine Eubanks
Defendant:
David R Meier , Grand Elk Railroad Co and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dohse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dohse
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Vest et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donnie J Vest , Richard N Howard , Toby C Chambers and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dipert v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dean Dipert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Mediator:
John W Whiteleather, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. CSX Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Osborne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Payne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ball et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Ball and Angela Ball
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Professional Transportation Inc, Maureen Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Winfrey v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2010cv02094
Plaintiff:
Alvin R Winfrey
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and I.T.S. Technologies and Logistics, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Craft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Evelyn G Craft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
John R Clark and John R Clark
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
