Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LUCERO et al v. SHEPARD et al
as 5:2018cv00228
Defendant: RANDY BROWN, DANIEL FASS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: DINA INES ESTRADA MADRID and ESTATE OF JIMMY LUCERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rupe v. Tostevin et al
as 1:2012cv03137
Plaintiff: Shade Rupe
Defendant: Carl Tostevin, Norman Hill and Subversive Cinema
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01924
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill et al v. Guaranty Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00222
Plaintiff: Christina Hill and Norman Hill
Defendant: Guaranty Bank, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02431
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Michael Abels v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35656
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY ABELS
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, CHRISTEN SKIPWORTH and NORMAN HILL
Michael Abels v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35575
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY ABELS
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, CHRISTEN SKIPWORTH and NORMAN HILL
Hill v. Soares
as 1:2008cv01322
Plaintiff: James Norman Hill, III
Defendant: Soares, Jobinger, Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abels v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv05303
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Abels
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Christen Skipworth and Norman Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?