Cases 1 - 10 of 32
United States of America v. Seabrook
as 23-6279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
NORMAN SEABROOK
Defendant:
MURRAY HUBERFELD
Seabrook v. United States of America
as 22-841
Petitioner / Appellant:
Norman Seabrook
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Seabrook v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv08767
Petitioner:
Norman Seabrook
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Seabrook
as 20-1918
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Norman Seabrook
Defendant:
Murray Huberfeld
United States of America v. Seabrook
as 19-472
Undetermined:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Norman Seabrook
Defendant:
Murray Huberfeld
United States of America v. Seabrook (Huberfeld)
as 19-436
Defendant / Appellant:
Norman Seabrook and Murray Huberfeld
Undetermined:
United States of America
Castro v. Brann
as 19-327
Defendant:
Elias Husamudeen, Acting President, New York City Department of Correction, New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ivon Castro
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth Castro, 2nd Vice President, Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, Inc., Dina Simon, Individually and as Deputy Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Romain et al v. Seabrook et al
as 1:2016cv08470
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Romain , Herman Jiminian , Jeanette Feliciano and others
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook, Elias Husamudeen , Joseph Bracco and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Roundtree v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv04730
Plaintiff:
Juel Roundtree, Johnathan Cruz, Jason Collazo and others
Defendant:
New York City, Corizon Medical, Commissioner Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
