Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Disability Rights NC v. North Carolina Board of Elections et al
as 5:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights NC
Defendant:
North Carolina Board of Elections, Jeff Carmon, III, Karen Brinson Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Norton v. Columbus Board of Elections
as 20-1333
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES E. PREVATTE, individually and in his official capacity as Columbus County Board of Commissioner, SCOTT ANDREW YATES, individually and in his official capacity as registered agent, president, and board of director of Red Dome Group, Inc., CHARLES MCDOWELL, individually and in his official capacity as Columbus County Board of Commissioner and others
Interested Party:
JEFF CARMON, DAVID BLACK, BOB CORDLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN TYRONE NORTON
Rudisill v. North Carolina Board of Elections
as 3:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rudisill and Lisa Carol Rudisill
Defendant:
North Carolina Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Common Cause v. David Lewis
as 19-1091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN MARK TURNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, WILLIAM SERVICE and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA MALCOLM, Vice-Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, KEN RAYMOND, Secretary of the North Carolina Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, ROBERT CORDLE, Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SENATOR RALPH E, HISE, JR., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Redistricting, REPRESENTATIVE DAVID R. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Senior Chairman of the House Select Committee on Redistricting, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Amicus Curiae:
REGINALD REID
Common Cause v. David Lewis
as 19-1094
Defendant:
JOHN LEWIS, Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, JOSHUA MALCOLM, Vice-Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, KEN RAYMOND, Secretary of the North Carolina Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE PHILIP E. BERGER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE TIMOTHY K. MOORE, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN DOUGLAS MCGRIGOR, JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR., REBECCA JOHNSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
REGINALD REID
BULLOCK v. GRANVILLE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALVIN BULLOCK, III
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Al Pisano v. Gary Bartlett
as 13-1368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL PISANO, NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION PARTY, NORTH CAROLINA GREEN PARTY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY O. BARTLETT, as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Elections, LARRY LEAKE, as Member of the North Carolina Board of Elections, ROBERT CORDLE, as Member of the North Carolina Board of Elections and others
Pitts et al v. O'Geary et al
as 5:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts, Seneca Nicholson-Pitts, Deryl Von Williams and others
Defendant:
James D. O'Geary, Ray Griffin, Frank Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pitts et al v. O'Geary et al
as 5:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts, Seneca Nicholson-Pitts and Deryl Von Williams
Defendant:
James D. O'Geary , Ray Griffin , Frank Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sarah Preston v. Larry Leake
as 10-2294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH PRESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY LEAKE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, GENEVIEVE C. SIMS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, LORRAINE G. SHINN, in her official capacity as a Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
