Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund et al v. Northwest Tower Crane Service, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund , Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Fund and Western Washington Operating Engineers-Employers Training Trust Fund
Defendant:
Northwest Tower Crane Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
COOTWARE v. AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv60008
Plaintiff:
JAMIE COOTWARE
Defendant:
AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION , AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. , BORG-WARNER INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY and MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY , AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION , AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cootware, Jamie v. American Crane and Equipment Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cootware
Defendant:
American Crane and Equipment Corporation, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Borg-Warner Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Evanston Insurance Company, et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insu, et al
as 12-35783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company and AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, NORTHWEST TOWER CRANE SERVICE INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company
Evanston Insurance Company, et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insu, et al
as 10-36133
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company and others
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Magnusson Klemencic Associates Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00804
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Magnusson Klemencic Associates Inc, Jon D Magnusson, Jane Doe Magnusson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
American Guarantee & Liability, et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insu, et al
as 08-35264
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company and others
Evanston Insurance Company et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007cv00923
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Royal Insurance Company of America, Royal Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
