Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. v. Quintalino et al
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. doing business as Norcom Mortgage
Defendant:
Thomas Quintalino, David Cooper and ANA Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC v. KOERNER
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC doing business as NORCOM MORTGAGE
Defendant:
MICHAEL S KOERNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC v. OHMEIS
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC doing business as NORCOM MORTGAGE
Defendant:
SARA OHMEIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Costa v. Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Leonel Costa
Defendant:
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. doing business as Norcom Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Coker v. Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03071
Defendant:
Greg Radding, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. v. Bottella et al
as 3:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Tammy A. Bottella and Law Office of Tammy A. Bottella, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. and Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. doing business as Norcom Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. v. Alexander
as 6:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Cory Alexander
Plaintiff:
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. and Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. doing business as Norcom Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rubin v. Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.
as 8:2014cv03246
Plaintiff:
Sandra R. Rubin
Defendant:
Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
