Cases 1 - 10 of 375
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 25-1271
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Schneider et al v. Morales et al
as 1:2025cv01296
Plaintiff:
Amanda Schneider, Michael Torres and John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert Morales, City of New York and Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Hawkins v. Robert Fountain
as 25-6148
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ANTONIO HAWKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT FOUNTAIN, FRED ROBERTSON, WOODROW DAVID YANCEY and others
Herring v. Wilson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00146
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Wilson, CO Froster, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Smith et al
as 2:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Martin
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeOrdio v. FCC-Allenwood USP et al
as 1:2025cv00076
Defendant:
FCC Allenwood USP Medical, FCC-Allenwood USP, Officer Birdsaw and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeOrdio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Martin
Defendant:
Jailer Jason Maydak and Correctional Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Med. Dept.
as 24-7125
Defendant:
OFFICER SMITH, ROCKINGHAM REGIONAL JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, OFFICER PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. CARUTHERS
Johnson v. Superintendent et al
as 9:2024cv01421
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Lamcia, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Morgan et al

as 4:2024cv05146
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Donald Holbrook, Cus Addamire, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.