Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
David Meyers v. Valrus Gernegen
as 23-6956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. VALRUS GERNEGEN, MCON Unit Manager SCI-4860 Facility, sued in official capacity, MR. MARCUS SCOTT, MCON Unit Manager SCI-4860 Facility, sued in official capacity, CAPTAIN INGRAM, Captain of Scotland Correctional Institute, sued in official capacity and others
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-6035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Ms. Gaul
as 22-6592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. GAUL, CAPTAIN, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
MORGAN v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Officer BLACKSHEARS, Officer MIZELL, LASALLE CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVEN ANTHONY MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
