Cases filed in Pennsylvania
O'BRADOVICH v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: MICHAEL OBRADOVICH
Defendant: CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., OPTUM, INC. and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00839
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04645
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
GENOMIND, INC. v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00373
Defendant: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OPTUM, INC. and others
Plaintiff: GENOMIND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROBERT W. MAUTHE, M.D., P.C. v. OPTUM, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv01643
Plaintiff: ROBERT W. MAUTHE, M.D., P.C.
Defendant: OPTUM, INC. and OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06207
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
INGRAM v. HIGHMARK INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00256
Plaintiff: ROBERT D. INGRAM, JR.
Defendant: HIGHMARK INC., OPTUM INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?